A new report by the Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI) throws cold water on a popular Wall Street tool for tackling climate change. Over 80% of sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs) issued between 2018 and late 2023 fail to align with global climate goals, raising concerns about greenwashing and the instrument’s effectiveness.
Why it Matters: SLBs, a rapidly growing market exceeding $280 billion, were hailed as a game-changer for curbing corporate greenhouse gas emissions. These bonds incentivize companies to achieve sustainability targets by penalizing them with higher interest rates for falling short.
The Wild West of Green Finance: “SLBs have the potential to be a powerful tool for transitioning the global economy to a greener future,” says CBI CEO Sean Kidney. However, he criticizes the current market as a “wild west” lacking proper regulation and transparency.
Flexibility vs. Ambition: Unlike green bonds earmarked for specific eco-friendly projects, SLB proceeds can be used for general corporate purposes. This flexibility attracts heavy polluters like steel and cement manufacturers who might struggle with green bond eligibility. However, it also creates a challenge: are companies setting ambitious enough sustainability goals?
Greenwashing Concerns: The SLB market has witnessed explosive growth, with major issuers like Italian energy giant Enel SpA jumping on board. However, issuance peaked at $110 billion in 2021, followed by a cooling of investor enthusiasm. Some SLBs have been accused of greenwashing by setting weak sustainability goals with minimal penalties for non-compliance.
CBI’s Damning Report: CBI’s research, based on their own assessment methodology, reveals a troubling disconnect between ambition and reality. Only 14% of issued SLBs align with the Paris Agreement’s target of limiting global warming below 2 degrees Celsius. The report identifies a “high proportion” of SLBs with “weak sustainability credentials,” lacking transparency, ambition, and credibility.
Fixing the Foundation: CBI emphasizes that the core concept of SLBs holds promise. The problem lies in design and execution. Structural flaws, weak calibration of penalties, poor reporting by issuers, and inadequate decarbonization plans undermine market quality. Additionally, resource constraints often hinder investors’ ability to screen out low-quality SLBs.
Loopholes Threaten Credibility: The report also highlights two concerning loopholes in SLB legal documents. One exempts issuers from penalties due to policy changes, essentially allowing them to move the goalposts. Another allows them to exclude post-issuance acquisitions and specific investments from performance evaluation, further weakening the link between bond issuance and actual sustainability progress.
A Glimpse of Hope: CBI acknowledges some improvement in 2023, with 33% (by issuance amount) of SLBs aligning with climate goals. This coincides with the release of their own guidance, which they hope will drive more responsible investments. Analyst Kevin Leung from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis remains optimistic. He believes sustainability-linked instruments can still drive decarbonization if performance targets are aligned with a stricter 1.5-degree pathway for all emission scopes and actively promote the transition to green activities.
ESG Concerns Beyond SLBs: The challenges with SLBs mirror a broader issue within the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing landscape. As companies increasingly tie executive pay to ESG performance, concerns are mounting about inflated compensation packages fueled by these add-ons without demonstrably improved environmental, social, or governance outcomes. Activist shareholders are demanding more transparent metrics around ESG-linked pay to hold companies accountable.
The Ripple Effect of ESG: The impact of ESG extends beyond SLBs. Real estate investors are scrambling to prepare for a potential “carbon shock” due to new European regulations. In the alternative investment space, a veteran manager is proposing a novel securitization method that would allow banks to reduce their balance sheets’ carbon footprint. Additionally, Morningstar highlights the growing traction of water investments due to rising demand and a global scarcity of clean water.
The Takeaway: The case of SLBs underscores the need for a comprehensive approach to ESG investing. Clearer standards, stricter regulations, and robust reporting practices are crucial to ensure these financial instruments fulfill their true potential in creating a more sustainable future.
For more:
https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/climate-issues/greenwashing
https://www.climatebonds.net/files/reports/cbi_slb_report_2024_04d.pdf
Cornellian Perspectives 
Leave a comment